Appendix: Don't Trust, Verify—A Deep Dive into Proof of Reserves

·

Introduction

Proof of Reserves (PoR) has become a critical trust mechanism in cryptocurrency exchanges. This guide explores which exchanges implement verifiable PoR systems, analyzing their methodologies, strengths, and areas for improvement.


Verifiable Proof of Reserves: OKX and BitMEX Lead the Way

OKX: Transparent and Open-Source Verification

Key Features:

How to Verify OKX’s Reserves

  1. Reserves:

    • Download the 211MB CSV file from OKX’s PoR page.
    • Run the Go-based verifier:

      ./build/VerifyAddress --por_csv_filename okx_por_2024041301.csv
  2. Liabilities:

    • Use the Python script zk_STARK_Validator.py to validate JSON proof files.

Limitations:

👉 Learn how OKX ensures transparency

Recommendations:


BitMEX: Bitcoin-Focused but Robust

Key Features:

How to Verify BitMEX’s Reserves

  1. Reserves:

    • Download YAML files from BitMEX’s PoR dashboard.
    • Validate via validate_reserves.py with a Bitcoin full node.
  2. Liabilities:

    • Check inclusion in the Merkle tree using validate_liabilities.py.

Recommendations:


Proof-of-Reserve Theater: Exchanges Falling Short

Kraken: Limited Verifiability

Recommendations:

👉 Why transparency matters in crypto exchanges

Deribit and Gate.io


FAQs

Q: How often should exchanges update PoR?
A: For hot wallets, biweekly (like BitMEX). Cold wallets may require less frequent updates due to operational costs.

Q: Which exchanges truly support PoR?
A: OKX and BitMEX are verifiable. Kraken and Deribit lack transparency.

Q: What’s the biggest flaw in current PoR systems?
A: Static key signatures (OKX) and limited asset coverage (BitMEX).


Conclusion

While OKX and BitMEX set the standard with verifiable PoR, other exchanges must improve transparency. Users should prioritize platforms offering open-source tools and frequent audits.