Bitcoin Cash vs. Bitcoin SV: A Post-Hash War Analysis

·

Introduction

The cryptocurrency landscape witnessed a pivotal moment in November 2018 when Bitcoin Cash (BCH) split into two chains—Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV). This hard fork, fueled by ideological and technical disagreements, sparked a hash war that tested the resilience of both networks. Six months later, we evaluate their progress, mining dynamics, scalability, and adoption.


Key Differences Between Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV

Origins and Ideological Divide

Technical Upgrades

FeatureBitcoin Cash (BCH)Bitcoin SV (BSV)
Block Size Limit32 MB128 MB
Key OpcodesOP_CHECKDATASIGNone
Replay ProtectionYesAdded post-fork

Mining: The Hash War Aftermath

Initial Conflict

Current Hash Power

Impact: Miners lost millions during the war, but both chains stabilized independently.

Scalability: Block Size and Performance

Adoption Reality

Security Concerns


Transaction Volume and Adoption

Usage Trends

Fee Comparison

ChainMedian Fee
BTC$1.03
BCH$0.00078
BSV$0.00029

👉 Explore more on cryptocurrency trends


FAQ Section

1. Why did Bitcoin SV fork from Bitcoin Cash?

BSV rejected BCH’s protocol upgrades, advocating for larger blocks and a return to Wright’s original Bitcoin whitepaper.

2. Which chain has better adoption?

Bitcoin Cash leads in transaction volume, but BSV targets enterprise use (e.g., invoicing, supply chains).

3. Is the hash war still ongoing?

No. Both chains stabilized post-fork, with BSV implementing replay protection.


Conclusion

Six months post-fork, Bitcoin Cash remains the dominant payment-focused chain, while Bitcoin SV bets on enterprise scalability. Despite initial volatility, both coexist—proof that blockchain governance conflicts can yield multiple viable paths.

👉 Stay updated on crypto developments